Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 adoption – A. McAfee Interview http://www.rfahey.org/2009/03/26/enterprise-20-adoption-a-mcafee-interview/ Collaboration // Transparency // Empowerment Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:02:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Richard Faheyhttp://www.rfahey.org/2009/03/26/enterprise-20-adoption-a-mcafee-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-7026 Richard Fahey Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:07:02 +0000 http://www.rfahey.org/?p=522#comment-7026 Thanks for that clarification and the link to your post on <a href="http://bfrench.info/public/item/5994" rel="nofollow">Transforming Information into Knowledge</a>. I've heard the phrase used to describe other mediums also e.g. PDFs are where knowledge goes to die. I guess platforms that do not allow for information to be easily updated and referenced, will slowly become irrelevant as knowledge repositories. Thanks for that clarification and the link to your post on Transforming Information into Knowledge.

I’ve heard the phrase used to describe other mediums also e.g. PDFs are where knowledge goes to die. I guess platforms that do not allow for information to be easily updated and referenced, will slowly become irrelevant as knowledge repositories.

]]> By: Bill Frenchhttp://www.rfahey.org/2009/03/26/enterprise-20-adoption-a-mcafee-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-6823 Bill French Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:34:27 +0000 http://www.rfahey.org/?p=522#comment-6823 Richard, this is a great article and interview. Minor clarification, the first use of "Email is where knowledge goes to die." apparently was me. I was on a flight to Sydney in 1999 when I coined the phrase in preparation for a series of IT conferences with the Australian Computing Society. The First published instance was a Sydney newspaper and the the first time I blogged about it was 2003 (http://bfrench.info/public/item/5994), but I've used it in many presentations and papers before 2003. I think the confusion concerning Doc Searls stems from a mention by Stowe Boyd a few years back. Ironically, my first use in Sydney occurred a few blocks from the current offices of the Google Wave development team. Richard, this is a great article and interview. Minor clarification, the first use of “Email is where knowledge goes to die.” apparently was me. I was on a flight to Sydney in 1999 when I coined the phrase in preparation for a series of IT conferences with the Australian Computing Society.

The First published instance was a Sydney newspaper and the the first time I blogged about it was 2003 (http://bfrench.info/public/item/5994), but I’ve used it in many presentations and papers before 2003.

I think the confusion concerning Doc Searls stems from a mention by Stowe Boyd a few years back.

Ironically, my first use in Sydney occurred a few blocks from the current offices of the Google Wave development team.

]]> By: Deepedition » The dawn of manhttp://www.rfahey.org/2009/03/26/enterprise-20-adoption-a-mcafee-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-5500 Deepedition » The dawn of man Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:30:03 +0000 http://www.rfahey.org/?p=522#comment-5500 [...] så finns ett djupt problem i ett av de citat som ofta lyfts upp i diskussionen runt den nya tekniken: We tend to overestimate the impact of new technologies in the short run and underestimate the [...] [...] så finns ett djupt problem i ett av de citat som ofta lyfts upp i diskussionen runt den nya tekniken: We tend to overestimate the impact of new technologies in the short run and underestimate the [...]

]]> By: Enterprise 2.0 Adoption and its failures « Glamorous Skyhttp://www.rfahey.org/2009/03/26/enterprise-20-adoption-a-mcafee-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-5383 Enterprise 2.0 Adoption and its failures « Glamorous Sky Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:53:45 +0000 http://www.rfahey.org/?p=522#comment-5383 [...] to the lecture notes and an interview from Andrew McAfee, the adoption of Enterprises to use Web 2.0 has been disorganised and spotty. There are several [...] [...] to the lecture notes and an interview from Andrew McAfee, the adoption of Enterprises to use Web 2.0 has been disorganised and spotty. There are several [...]

]]>